Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, Roelen BA, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl. 2006; 27(2):176-188. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.04152
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.04152
Gadea J, Sellés E, Marco MA. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reprod Domest Anim. 2004; 39(5):303-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00513.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00513.x
Davis RO, Drobnis EZ, Overstreet JW. Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function, and stepwise regression analyses to variable selection and predictive modeling of sperm cryosurvival. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63(5):1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57547-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57547-5
Tuli R, Schmidt-Baulain R, Holtz W. Computer-assisted motility assessment of spermatozoa from fresh and frozen—thawed semen of the bull, boar and goat Theriogenology. 1992; 38(3):487-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90068-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90068-3
Karabinus DS, Evenson DP, Jost L, Baer R, Kaproth M. Comparison of semen quality in young and mature Holstein bulls measured by light microscopy and flow cytometry. J. Dairy Sci. 1990; 73(9):2364-2371. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78919-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78919-9
Enciso M. La fragmentación del AND en espermatozoides de mamíferos. (Tesis doctoral) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: España; 2009 http://hdl.handle.net/10486/4150
Ntemka A, Tsousis G, Brozos C, Boscos CM, Tsakmakidis IA. Breed differences of bull frozen‐thawed semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2016; 51: 945-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12769
Amann RP, Katz DF. Andrology Lab Corner: Reflections on C.A.S.A after 25 years. J Androl. 2004; 25:317-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02793.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02793.x
Khalil WA, El-Harairy MA, Zeidan AEB, Hassan MAE, Mohey-Elsaeed O. Evaluation of bull spermatozoa during and after cryopreservation: Structural and ultrastructural insights. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine. 2018; 6:S49-S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.11.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.11.001
Addad R, Freneau G, Resende L, Silva L. Evaluación clínica andrológica de toros nelore y tests de viavilidad espermática, integridad de acrosoma y fragmentación de cromatina a lo largo de tres estaciones de monta. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2009; 10:1044-1054. https://www.revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/3395
Posado R, Hernández M, García JJ, Bartolomé DJ, López C, Gosálvez J. Evolución de la fragmentación del ADN en semen criopreservado de toros de Lidia. Arch Cootec. 2011; 60(231):441-444. http://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000300031
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000300031
Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17(12):3122-3128. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3122
Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science. 1980; 210(4474):1131-1133. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444440
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444440
Larson KL, DeJonge CJ, Barnes AM, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(8):1717-1722. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1717
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1717
Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WM. Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 62(1-3):143-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00157-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00157-3
Viñán DH, Alvarado ME. Adición de metil- β-ciclodextrina cargada de colesterol sobre la criopreservación de semen de toros Holstein Friesian. Revista De Investigaciones Veterinarias Del Perú. 2020; 30(4):1611-1618. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i4.17159
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i4.17159
Januskauska A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Assessment of sperm quality through fluorometry and sperm chromatin structure assay in relation to field fertility of frozen-thawed semen from Swedish AI bulls. Theriogenology. 2001; 55(4):947-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00456-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00456-3
Veloz DM. Evaluación de la calidad espermática de reproductores bovinos mediante el uso de sistemas de evaluación seminal convencional y sistema C.A.S.A (análisis seminal asistido por computadora) y su respuesta con la fertilidad por inseminación artificial. Tesis (Maestría). Universidad de Cuenca: Ecuador; 2017. http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/28466
Sundararaman M, Kalatharan J, Thilak J. Computer assisted semen analysis for quantification of motion characteristics of bull sperm during cryopreservation cycle. Vet World. 2012; 5(12):723-726. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.723-726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.723-726
Morte MI, Rodrigues AM, Soares D, Rodrigues AS, Gamboa S, Ramalho-Santos J. The quantification of lipid and protein oxidation in stallion spermatozoa and seminal plasma: seasonal distinctions and correlations with DNA strand breaks, classical seminal parameters and stallion fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008; 106(1-2):36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.020
Muiño OR. Evaluación de la motilidad y viabilidad del semen bovino mediante el uso de sistemas C.A.S.A y citometría de flujo, identificación de subpoblaciones espermáticas. Tesis (Grado). Universidad de Santiago de Compostela: España; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10347/2406
Hirano Y, Shibahara H, Obara H, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Yamaguchi C, Tsunoda H, Sato I. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (C.A.S.A) and fertilization rates in vitro. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001; 18(4):213-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009420432234
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009420432234
Ormachea VE, Calsin CB, Zegarra OE. Cinética y morfometría espermática en semen congelado sexado y convencional de toros Brown Swiss. Revista De Investigaciones Veterinarias Del Perú. 2019; 30(1):500-506. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i1.14696
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i1.14696
Ancco G. Efecto de la motilidad espermática en la producción de embriones in vitro en bovinos. Tesis (Grado). Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina: Ecuador; 2017. http://repositorio.lamolina.edu.pe/handle/UNALM/2898
Mora C, Mendez N. Evaluación espermática de ganado bovino mediante un sistema de análisis computacional (C.A.S.A.). Tlamati Sabiduría. 2016; 7:1-10. http://tlamati.uagro.mx/t7e2/241.pdf
Quintín FJ, Hernández M, Sevilla M, Banzo P, Alabart JL, Serraller JM. Valoración reproductiva de toros jóvenes de testaje de raza Parda de montaña. AIDA. 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10532/2275
Shanis BS, Check IJ, Bolendorf A, Interpretation and misinterpretation of semen parameters. Archives of Andrology Journal of Reproductive Systems. 2009; 23(3):213-227. https://doi.org/10.3109/01485018908986844
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01485018908986844
Bravo JA, Montanero J, Calero R, Roy TJ. Relación entre variables subjetivas e informatizadas del movimiento espermático del morueco. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2011; 60(232):1087-1094. http://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000400024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000400024
Holt WV. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 62(1-3):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4
Watson PF. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995; 7(4):871-891. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd9950871
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950871