Effect of organic acid in layers on productive parameters and water quality

Efecto de ácido orgánico en ponedoras sobre los parámetros productivos y calidad del agua

Main Article Content

Sindy Lilibeth Chica-Rosado
Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.
Juan Cedeño-Pozo
Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.
Johnny Xavier Barcia-Anchundia.
Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootecnica. Chone, Ecuador.

Abstract

The organic acid improves the productive parameters and the response to treatments. With the aim of evaluating the use of organic acids in the layers of the Hy-Line line to determine the effect on the productive parameters and the quality of the water in the rearing stage from week 10 to week 16. An investigation was carried out using a completely randomized design, where four treatments and four replications with 20 units each were used, called T0 (control), T1, T2 and T3; administering the mixture of organic acids in the dose established for each treatment 0.5 cc; 1 cc and 1.5 cc per liter of water. Variables such as initial chicken weight, chicken weight per week, feed consumption, water consumption and mortality were evaluated. Likewise, a physical-chemical analysis was carried out: pH of the water, residual chlorine, temperature and hardness. Higher productive parameters were obtained (p = <0.05) compared to the control group. The best results in body weight were obtained in T3 with 1385.50g. In the same way, T3 managed to obtain a better result in the consumption of water during all the weeks, except in the fourteen that it was T1 who obtained a better average. Regarding the physical-chemical analysis, T1 had a better pH of 3.29; free chlorine: 0.17mg / l and residual hardness: 7.64mg / l; It is concluded that the best result in productive parameters was T3, while in the physical-chemical analysis, T1 obtained significant improvements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
0%
33%
Days to publication 
80
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Universidad de Sucre
Publisher 
Universidad de Sucre

Article Details

Author Biographies / See

Sindy Lilibeth Chica-Rosado, Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.

Sindy Lilibeth Chica Rosado.
Ingeniera Zootecnista.
Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.

lilibth06@hotmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-4816.

 

Juan Cedeño-Pozo, Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.

Juan Cedeño-Pozo

Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnica. Chone, Ecuador.

juan.cedeno01@utm.edu.ec

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-0309

Johnny Xavier Barcia-Anchundia., Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootecnica. Chone, Ecuador.

Johnny Xavier Barcia Anchundia.

Ingeniero Zootecnista.

Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Facultad de Ciencias Zootecnica. Chone, Ecuador.

xavier_0617@hotmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-0876    

References / See

Triana S, Morales Y, Gonzalez O, Ramirez Y. Aplicación del Viocan 1 en el comportamiento bioproductivo de gallinas ponedoras. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria REDVET. 2005; 6(9):1–6. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/636/63612657005.pdf

Pomboza-Tamaquiza P, Guerrero-López R, Guevara-Freire D, Rivera V. Granjas avícolas y autosuficiencia de maíz y soya: caso Tungurahua-Ecuador. Estud Soc Rev Aliment Contemp Desarro Reg. 2018; 28(51). https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v28i51.511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v28i51.511

Chirinos González A, Urdaneta M. Medición de la eficiencia en el sector avícola mediante índices de Malmquist. Agroalimentaria. 2007; 12(25):95–107.

Calle C, Estrada M, Barrios D, Agudelo G. Construcción de un índice de competitividad para el sector avícola colombiano. Lect Econ. 2017; (83):193–228. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n83a07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n83a07

Báez Quiñones N, Oramas Santos O. El enfoque de cadenas de valor: una necesidad en el sector avícola cubano. Econ Desarro. 2018; 159(1):154–65.

Ángel-Isaza J, Mesa-Salgado N, Narváez-Solarte W. Ácidos orgánicos, una alternativa en la nutrición avícola: una revisión. CES Med Vet Zootec. 2019; 14(2):45–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.14.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.14.2.4

Yesilbag D. Effects of organic acid supplemented diets on growth performance, egg production and quality and on serum parameters in laying hens. Rev Med Vet. 2006; 157(5):280–4.

Paredes-Mendoza M, Espinosa-Victoria D. Ácidos orgánicos producidos por rizobacterias que solubilizan fosfato: una revisión crítica. Terra Latinoam. 2010; 28(1):61–70. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-57792010000100007

Gonzáles A. S, Icochea D. E, Reyna S. P, Guzmán G. J, Cazorla M. F, Lúcar J, et al. Efecto de la suplementación de ácidos orgánicos sobre los parámetros productivos en pollos de engorde. Rev Investig Vet Peru. 2013; 24(1):32–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v24i1.1653

Barrera-Barrera HM, Rodríguez-González SP, Torres- Vidales G. Efectos de la adición de ácido cítrico y un probiótico comercial en el agua de bebida, sobre la morfometría del duodeno y parámetros zootécnicos en pollo de engorde. ORINOQUIA. 2004; 18(2):52–62. https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.306

Hy-Line. Guía de manejo de la línea Hy-Line [Internet]. 2018. https://www.hyline.com/filesimages/Hy-Line-Products/Hy-Line-Product-PDFs/Brown/BRN%20COM%20SPN.pdf

Islam KMS, Schaeublin H, Wenk C, Wanner M, Liesegang A. Effect of dietary citric acid on the performance and mineral metabolism of broiler. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012; 96(5):808–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01225.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01225.x

Freitag M. Organic acids and salts promote performance and health in animal husbandry [Internet]. 2007.

Samudovska A, Demeterova M, Skalicka M, Bujñak L, Nad P. Effect of water acidification on some morphological, digestive and production traits in broiler chickens. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2018; 21(3):269–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.1065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.1065

El-Hakim A, Cherian G, Ali M. Use of organic acid, herbs and their combination to improve the utilization of commercial low protein broiler diets. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2009; 8(1):14–20. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.14.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.14.20

Chowdhury R, Islam K, Khan M, Karim M, Haque M, Khatun M, et al. Effect of citric acid, avilamycin, and their combination on the performance, tibia ash, and immune status of broilers. Poultry Science. 2009; 88(8):1616–1622. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00119

Citado por

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Europe PMC